Starring: Ken Maynard
Director: Alan James
Studio: Universal Pictures
PLOT SUMMARY:
Ken Masters (Ken Maynard) tracks down Silas Stone (William Gould) who allegedly had Ken's father committed to a sanitarium. Ken nearly gets the drop on Stone, when his son Hank (Harold Goodwin) accidentally kills his father. Hank frames Ken for the murder, but Ken escapes. Three years later, Ken is found in the jungle by Ranger Dick Evans (Walter Miller) and is promptly captured. Unfortunately, while paddling to Evans' cabin, both Evans and Ken are surrounded by crocodiles who devour Evans' leg. Not wanting to suffer from gangrene, Evans kills himself. Ken then assumes the identity of Evans and heads back to town to track down Hank Stone. As it turns out, Stone and his henchmen are holding Ken's father (Ed Coxen) hostage in his own home. This is because Silas Stone wanted the elder Masters' house for the rich gold mine contained underneath it. With the help of his faithful butler Cinders (Martin Turner) and Alice Adams (Gloria Shea), Ken plots to capture Stone and clear his name once and for all!
FILM REVIEW:
Many times during my viewing of Smoking Guns, I asked myself "What even is this movie?" Here you have one of the screen's best western stars fighting crocodiles with a blonde wig and beard on. Who thought this was a good idea? Apparently, Ken Maynard himself. Maynard is credited with the story and it makes one ponder as to why a cowboy would somehow wind up in the jungle of all places? The whole jungle sequence just feels out of place in what should be a conventional western. More unnerving is Ken's appearance during these scenes, complete with an obvious hairpiece and fake beard, it is all just mind-numbingly bad. By the time we get back to town and a somewhat more conventional western ensues, we are already exhausted with the movie and just wish for it to end.
Indeed, the whole haunted mine section of the film, which is far more interesting, takes up even less screen time. The whole film is a jumbled mess and is one of those legendarily bad 1930's films in a class with such lowlights as Reefer Madness, Maniac and Down to Their Last Yacht! This turkey is possibly the worst "B" western released by a major studio, at least that I've seen. I'd really like to know what Maynard's thought process was here? What inspired this drivel? Did Maynard have a boyhood dream of fighting crocodiles in the jungle and saw this as an excuse to live out that dream? I'm still relatively knew to the genre, having discovered the cheapie western over five years ago, but I doubt very many of them ventured outside the typical western setting in such a way as this film does.
I can totally understand why old man Laemmle gave Maynard the boot after this film, it is absolutely atrocious and lives up to its reputation. It reminded me of the Billy Squier music video for "Rock Me Tonite." It's not inherently bad for what it is but because of who the participants are. The America of 1984 were not prepared to see rock idol Billy Squier prancing around a bedroom with silky sheets and I doubt the America of 1934 was prepared to see a blonde, bearded Ken Maynard fighting crocodiles. In anyone else's hands this may not have been so egregiously bad, but the fact that it's Ken Maynard of all people makes it so.
In my review of Wheels of Destiny, I said that if Maynard had been left to his own devices then he could churn out a great movie. This, I believe to still be true, but with the caveat that Maynard be reeled in whenever his ideas bordered on the ridiculous. Smoking Guns is yet another bad vanity project, much like Tommy Wiseau's The Room, but unlike the former feature, Wiseau's film is at least entertaining, albeit for all the wrong reasons.
Suffice it to say, I do not recommend Smoking Guns, a product of the insane category. Even the film's posters don't allude to how convoluted the proceedings are.
Until next time, pardners!













